RSS .92| RSS 2.0| ATOM 0.3
  • Home
  • Events
  • About
  • Places We Like, People We Love
  • Volunteer Opportunities
  •  

    Upcoming Referendum 71 Events

    September 15th, 2009

    Please join us for an Approve 71 Community Organizing Meeting. Be a part of the organizing strategy in your community and learn about specific opportunities to help. Below is a listing of the times and places of meetings to be held around the state between September 9 and September 20. Bring your friends and family – join thousands of volunteers in your community to help us save the domestic partnership law.

    Sign up now! Visit www.fusewashington.org to RSVP

    To find the meeting nearest you and to RSVP for the event, check out the list of organizing events around the state:

    City
    Meeting Date
    Time
    Meeting location

    Bellingham
    September 20th
    3:00 pm to 4:30 pm
    Bellingham Unitarian Fellowship,
    1708 “I” Street
    Bellingham, WA 98225

    Everett
    September 19th
    10:30 am to 12 pm
    Labor Temple
    (Warren Rush Hall)
    2810 Lombard Ave,
    Everett, WA 98201

    Kitsap – Kingston
    September 20th
    10:30 am to 12 pm
    Kingston Community Center,
    Kingston Room, 11212 State Hwy 104,
    Kingston, WA 98346

    Kitsap – Poulsbo
    September 20th
    1:00 pm to 2:30 pm
    Poulsbo Fire Hall
    911 NE Liberty Rd
    Poulsbo, WA
    98370-8573

    Olympia
    September 9th
    6:00 pm to 7:30 pm
    Downtown Olympia Library
    (8th and Franklin)
    313 8th Ave SE
    Olympia, WA 98501-9300

    Seattle
    September 15th
    6:00 pm to 8:00 pm
    Broadway Performance Hall
    1625 Broadway
    Seattle, WA 98122-2498

    Spokane
    September 14th
    7:00 pm to 8:30 pm
    Unitarian Universalist Church of Spokane, 4340 W. Ft. Wright Dr.,
    Spokane, WA 99224

    Tacoma
    September 16th
    6:00 pm to 7:00 pm
    1st United Methodist,
    621 Tacoma Avenue South
    Tacoma, WA 98402

    Tri Cities
    September 17th
    5:30 pm to 7:00 pm
    Gettmann Hall,
    2625 W. Bruneau Pl,
    Kennewick, WA, 99336

    Vancouver
    September 14th
    6:00 pm to 7:30 pm
    Clark County YWCA
    3609 Main St
    Vancouver, WA 98663-2225

    Yakima
    September 16th
    7:00 pm to 8:30 pm
    Unitarian Universalist Church of Yakima,
    225 N. 2nd Street,
    Yakima, WA 98901

    Walla Walla
    September 15th
    6:00 pm to 7:30 pm
    First Congregational Church
    Fellowship Hall
    73 South Palouse St.
    (Corner of Palouse & Alder St.)

    Watch for announcements of other upcoming Approve 71 organizing meetings, campaign material distribution centers, and phonebanks in your area.

    Share

    Straight spouses advocate same-sex marriage as way of creating more perfect unions

    September 14th, 2009

    – By Lisa Leff, http://blog.taragana.com
    Sept 14th, 2009

    Straight spouses advocate same-sex marriage

    SAN FRANCISCO — Wah Cheong, a lifelong Republican and the soon-to-be divorced father of two teenage boys, sometimes surprises his co-workers and neighbors in a relatively conservative community outside San Francisco when he says he supports same-sex marriage.

    “Here is my situation,” the 47-year-old chemical engineer tells them when the hot-button topic comes up. “If gays and lesbians were more accepted, I wouldn’t have married a closeted lesbian.”

    Silence usually follows. Then, a spark of understanding.

    Of all the constituency groups that advocate allowing gay couples to wed, none is perhaps more counterintuitive than the heterosexual spouses of gay men and lesbians.

    Yet as the issue plays out in the nation’s courtrooms and statehouses, some of the wives and husbands who learned that their partner was attracted to other women or men are making their voices known in the often-polarized debate.

    “We are the unacknowledged victims of the victims of homophobia,” said Amity Pierce Buxton, the founder of the Straight Spouse Network, a New Jersey-based support and advocacy group with 52 U.S. chapters. “When gays and lesbians feel they have to get married to be accepted and to have kids, that hurts not only gays and lesbians, but straight spouses and kids.”

    The board of the volunteer-run organization, which claims thousands of participants, has adopted a policy of opposing laws that limit marriage to a man and a woman. Last fall, as California voters considered whether to amend the state Constitution to outlaw same-sex marriages, Buxton, 80, who lives in Oakland, wrote an impassioned opinion piece arguing against Proposition 8.

    Some network participants have marched in gay pride parades, tried to persuade church groups that the Bible should not be used to justify anti-gay attitudes, and met with groups of gay fathers struggling to stay on good terms with their ex-wives. Others have expressed their views on talk shows when married politicians like former New Jersey Gov. Jim McGreevey come out or are outed, or just quietly shared their perspectives in hope of changing a few minds.

    To be sure, not all mates who discover they are in what has become known as “mixed-orientation marriages” are so sanguine. Cheong, who was married for more than 17 years when his wife told him she thought she was a lesbian, said he knows other straight spouses who voted for California’s same-sex marriage ban “out of spite for their ex’s, nothing else.”

    Regardless of where they are on the acceptance scale, each spouse can pinpoint devastating moments of discovery or disclosure that rendered their marital relationships unrecognizable, if not shattered.

    For Carolyn Sega Lowengart, 61, who lives outside Washington, D.C., it came after 31 years of marriage. Lowengart thinks if her husband had not seen his sexual orientation as a stigma, both of them would have been free to pursue other relationships.

    After her husband moved out, “I asked him, ‘When did you know”” He said, ‘When I was a teenager.’ I said, ‘Why did you marry me?’ And he said, ‘Because I didn’t want to be (gay),’” she said.

    Randy Spires, 59, a former military police officer who lives in Southern Maryland, said he went through it on his 21st wedding anniversary when he found an e-mail his wife had sent to her female lover. Compounding his anger and confusion were the reactions of straight male friends who joked that Spires was lucky to be married to a lesbian.

    “I’ve always compared the straight spouses with a chalk line at a crime scene,” said Spires. “The gay and lesbian community doesn’t want to associate with us because they think we are angry or what do you have to worry about, you’re straight. And then you have the heterosexual side saying wait a minute, there must be something wrong with you for this to happen. We lose our own identity. We don’t have a face.”

    Spires’ ex-wife, Sue Spires, says she regrets having hurt Randy but does not completely understand why, 13 years later, he feels a need to talk about the end of their marriage, which produced two sons. But she agrees with him that if same-sex relationships had been more accepted when they were young, she would have had a relationship with a woman.

    “I knew I was gay from the time I was 8-years-old,” she said. “But the socially correct thing to do was to get married. That’s what I did. We didn’t have an unhappy marriage, but if I could do it again I would be able to tell him, ‘No, I’m sorry, I can’t go through with this.”

    Buxton, whose 1991 book, “The Other Side of the Closet,” is considered the definitive work on the topic, estimates there are as many as 2 million gay men and lesbians in the United States are or have been in heterosexual marriages. About seven out of every 10 involve women married to gay men, she said.

    Of those who contact the Straight Spouse Network — the organization hears from five new straight spouses a day — about one-third immediately split up when the gay partner comes out. Another third stay together for a year or two. The remaining third resolve to make their marriages work.

    Citrus Heights, Calif. residents Jim and Anne Marie Will are in the last category. Former high school sweethearts, they had been together for 15 years and married for 11 years when Jim told his wife in 2001 that he thought he was gay but had never acted on his feelings.

    The couple, who have a 16-year-old daughter, decided to stay together and to give both of them the option to pursue sexual relationships outside the marriage, which Jim Will has done. Yet the bond between them remains strong, if unconventional.

    When asked why they have remained married, both spouses say there is no one else with whom they would rather share their lives.

    “Being open and honest relieved my burden of guilt and we were able to consider ways to safely accommodate my additional desires. There continues to be no one else we want to have a life with,” Jim Hill said.

    “The one thing I have asked him to do for me is to not hook up with other gay married men,” Anne Marie Hill said. “I have seen the devastation these women have gone through, and I don’t want him to be part of that.”

    Share

    Teen faces sentence in attack on gay teen

    September 14th, 2009

    – Posted by The AP, www.freep.com
    Sept 14th, 2009

    KALAMAZOO — One of two teenagers accused of beating a 15-year-old boy because he is homosexual is scheduled to be sentenced after pleading guilty to an aggravated assault charge.

    The 16-year-old defendant is to be back in Kalamazoo County Family Court.

    Portage teen Steve Harmon says he was attacked Aug. 13 in a Portage parking lot. He says his attackers used anti-gay slurs as they struck him about 20 times in the head and face.

    Harmon suffered a fractured cheek bone, two black eyes, a swollen lip and scratches on his face and neck.

    Police confirm that he apparently was targeted because of his sexual orientation.

    The two defendants were not charged with a hate crime because the state’s ethnic-intimidation law doesn’t address sexual orientation.

    Share

    R-71: Gay rights allies must not be silent

    September 13th, 2009

    E. DUANE WILKERSON; EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR PIERCE COUNTY AIDS FOUNDATION
    Published: 09/13/09
    http://www.thenewstribune.com/opinion/letters/story/877924.html
    To paraphrase Edmund Burke, “All that is necessary for evil to succeed is that good citizens do nothing.”

    In the face of the latest fear-based initiative to strip away human rights from gay men and lesbian women (Referendum 71), it is time for all allies of gays and lesbians to stand up.

    Gay rights, gay unions, gay marriages threaten my heterosexual marriage how? Two people committed to love each other for the rest of their lives, to build a loving life together . . . this threatens my marriage how?

    My spouse and I of 26 years have learned much from our gay and lesbian couple friends. They have showed us what it means to commit to one another in the face of all social, community and religious structures that ignore and hide them at best and demonize them at worst. How many heterosexual marriages would last with such constant assaults?

    We recently spent two days with a lesbian couple in Atlanta. We did not come home tempted to throw our relationship away or to look for other partners. We came home with renewed inspiration and commitment to our marraige. We came home with a model of two loving people who have to make the same compromises, find the same common ground that has made our marriage a strong and happy one.

    Don’t be silent any longer, allies. There’s too much to lose for all of us.

    Share

    Approve Referendum 71 PSA

    September 13th, 2009

    This is a video that Sean & my family made to get the message out about
    Washington states new domestic partner law. A yes vote will let the
    domestic partnership protections take place.

    Follow our blog: http://gayfamilyvalues.blogspot.com/

    Approve Referendum 71

    Click on Approve Referendum 71 above for video

    Share

    Commentary: Acts of kindness are the way to mark 9/11

    September 11th, 2009

    - By Jay S. Winuk
    Special to CNN

    Editor’s note: Jay S. Winuk, co-founder of MyGoodDeed, is the brother of Glenn J. Winuk, an attorney and volunteer firefighter and EMT who died in the line of duty when the South Tower of the World Trade Center collapsed on September 11, 2001. This week Glenn was posthumously honored with the 9/11 Heroes Medal of Valor from the United States of America.

    Art Jay Winuk

    Art Jay Winuk

    Jay Winuk says September 11 is best observed as a day of service to others.

    The upcoming eighth anniversary of the attacks of September 11 raises a compelling question for millions of Americans: How should we best observe this uniquely tragic day in our nation’s history?

    Surely, it should not be a holiday. This is no time for days off from work and three-day weekends to enjoy barbeques and white sales.

    No, September 11 is a day for reflection, and its historical and emotional significance should not lessen with time or be diminished in any way. It is a day to focus on the substantial lessons learned.

    I’m a 9/11 family member. My brave brother, Glenn J. Winuk, was a partner at a large law firm, Holland & Knight, located two blocks from the World Trade Center.

    For almost 20 years Glenn was also a volunteer firefighter and an emergency medical technician. When the Towers were hit, Glenn borrowed rescue equipment and ran from safety toward the South Tower to participate in the rescue effort. He died when the South Tower collapsed.

    What if … we all worked together?
    On October 10, join iReporters around the world who are volunteering or giving to charity. Show us how you made a difference. Send your video and snapshots.
    Visit http://www.ireport.com/blogs/ireport-blog/2009/09/08/save-the-date

    Soon after the attacks, I co-founded, with my friend David Paine and other 9/11 family members and friends, a grassroots initiative called MyGoodDeed. Our goal? To establish the anniversary of September 11, 2001 as an annually recognized national day of service.

    Our widely shared view was that there would be no better way to pay tribute to those thousands lost and those millions who rose in spontaneous, compassionate and effective service to help rebuild our spirit and our nation in the aftermath of the attacks.

    Supported by all the leading 9/11 family, survivor and volunteer organizations, the initiative has since attracted the attention and participation of millions of people around the world, from all 50 states and more than 170 nations and territories.

    People choose whatever form of kindness and service they’d like to perform each 9/11. And with acts large and small, they are making a real difference in the lives of people and communities in need.

    Some make donations — clothing, books, eyeglasses, money, blood. Some help repair schools and parks and beaches. Some send care packages to our troops overseas, or work in soup kitchens. Some read to the blind, or visit the elderly.

    This Sunday, retired New York Giants great George Martin is leading a fundraising walk from New York to New Jersey to raise money for the health care of thousands of rescue and recovery workers of Ground Zero who are ailing as a result of their service after 9/11. There is no limit to what people can do to participate.

    Of note is that just like those who died in the horror of that September morning, those who engage in service on 9/11 represent a wide range of political preferences, ages, races, religions, economic status and geographic locations.

    Unlike as suggested recently by some conservative journalists and bloggers, this 9/11 service phenomenon is not new and is certainly not about some kind of liberal agenda intended to diminish the meaning of September 11 or redefine it for political gain.

    Indeed, the notion of engaging in service to mark each 9/11 began during the Bush administration, and has been widely supported by both sides of the aisle on Capitol Hill. In fact, in 2004 the U.S. Congress unanimously passed House Congressional Resolution 473, saying the anniversary of September 11 should be a national day of service and compassion.

    In April of this year, President Obama signed the Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act, substantially bi-partisan legislation that included a provision formally establishing September 11 as a “National Day of Service and Remembrance.”

    The 9/11 community largely applauded this major step forward. And as I watched the president sign this legislation, along with members of the ServiceNation coalition and surrounded by a diverse group of political leaders, educators, students, service volunteers and others, I experienced both chills and a feeling of great warmth as I thought about my brother who died in service to others.

    Service as a way to honor the victims, workers and volunteers of September 11 ensures that future generations will learn not only about the attacks but about how good people around the world responded when our nation was severely wounded. Further, it serves as a productive and meaningful way forward out of the ashes of September 11 as our national challenges are now as great as ever.

    Some people say, “Enough about 9/11 already. Let’s move on.” Surely, I understand that. Even while remembering, we must move ahead. And that’s really the point about this observance. Let’s pay tribute to all those who were injured or who perished, like my brother, and to all those who rose in service to save and protect our nation, by looking forward and by improving the lot of those people and communities in need.

    This moment in history was not just about the attacks. It was also about compassion. And that is the lesson of the events of 9/11, and for me is the essence of this National Day of Service and Remembrance.

    The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Jay S. Winuk.

    Share

    Capitol Rattled by Republican Sex Scandal

    September 11th, 2009

    - posted by www.californiachronicle.com September 11, 2009

    GOP lawmaker’s salacious sex-bragging caught on tape.

    Assemblyman Michael Duvall, (R-Yorba Linda) resigned in disgrace this week after he was caught on tape bragging about extramarital affairs with two women, one of whom is a lobbyist. The conversation took place during a lull in business at a legislative hearing between Duvall and Assemblyman Jeff Miller (R-Corona), who has since been removed from his position on the Assembly Ethics Commission. Duvall, 54, is married and has two children.

    Michael Duvall (R)
    Michael Duvall (R)

    Duvall can be seen and heard on the tape leaning over to Miller to whisper, “She wears little eye-patch underwear … the other day she came here with her underwear, Thursday. And so, we had made love Wednesday a lot! … she’s all, ‘I am going up and down the stairs, and you’re dripping out of me!’ So messy!’”

    Duvall revealed more information about the women with whom he is involved. “And so her birthday was Monday. I was 54 on June 14, so for a month, she was 19 years younger than me. I said, ‘Now, you’re getting old. I am going to have to trade you in.’ And she goes, ‘I’m 36.’ She is 18 years younger than me. And so I keep teasing her, and she goes, ‘I know you French men. You divide your age by two and add seven, and if you’re older than that, you dump us.’”

    Duvall continued, “So, I am getting into spanking her. Yeah, I like it. I like spanking her.” Miller can be heard asking if she likes it and Duvall responded, “She goes, ‘I know you like spanking me.’ I said, ‘Yeah! Because you’re such a bad girl!’”

    News reports revealed one of the women to be Heidi Dejong Barsuglia, a married 36-year-old lobbyist who works for an energy company. Duvall´s State Assembly website was obliterated of data immediately after his resignation. However, Duvall did post a notice on his campaign website stating that his resignation was not an admission of having an affair. “I want to make it clear that my decision to resign is in no way an admission that I had an affair or affairs. My offense was engaging in inappropriate story-telling and I regret my language and choice of words.”

    Duvall, who campaigned as a “family values” lawmaker, received a 100% approval score from the Capitol Resource Institute (CRI), a conservative lobbying group in Sacrament. Duvall has been a staunch opponent of gay rights and supported Proposition 8, a ban on same-sex marriage in California. Lorri L. Jean, Chief Executive Officer of the Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Center was outraged at Duvall’s request for privacy.

    “Even as he resigns in shame,” Jean said, “former California Assemblymember Michael Duvall is wallowing in hypocrisy. While engaging in extra-marital affairs, he used ‘family values’ as a justification to vote against every bill that would have provided any measure of equal treatment or fairness to LGBT people. He used the same justification to support taking away the lawful right of same-sex couples to marry. Now he has the temerity to protest that his adultery (with lobbyists) ‘is a private matter’ and asks that ‘everyone respect the privacy of all involved?!”

    Jean continued, “It’s Duvall’s hypocrisy regarding his infidelity that makes him so especially despicable. He joins a long line of equally discredited, anti-gay ‘family values’ conservatives like evangelical U.S. Senators David Vitter and John Ensign, and South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford. At least Duvall had a modicum of decency and resigned, while those of the Vitter/Ensign/Sanford ilk brazenly continue on, still embraced by their ‘family values’ colleagues.”

    Duvall was first elected to the State Assembly in 2006. He represented Fullerton, Anaheim, Placentia, Orange, Brea and Yorba Linda. He served six years on the Yorba Linda City Council and owns an insurance agency.

    Share

    Federal Judge Blocks Public Release of Referendum 71 Petitions

    September 11th, 2009

    - Posted by Unite the Fight! at 11:30 AM, September 11, 2009

    Federal Judge Benjamin Settle in Tacoma, Washington ordered a preliminary injunction Thursday against the release of Referendum 71 petitions to the public, keeping the names of those who signed anonymous. Citing the First Amendment of free speech, even anonymous free speech, the judge ruled that the state of Washington did not prove a compelling public interest.

    This ruling clearly goes against state law which clearly states that petitions to change state law should be made public.

    Brian Zylstra, spokesman for Secretary of State Sam Reed, told the Seattle Times that the judge’s decision “is a step away from open government.”

    “When people sign a referendum or initiative petition, they are trying to change state law,” he said. “We believe that changing state law should be open to public view.”

    Referendum 71, sponsored by a conservative political group called Protect Marriage Washington, is asking voters in Washington to approve or reject the “everything but marriage” domestic partnership law that state lawmakers passed earlier this year.

    Protect Marriage Washington, which filed the suit to keep names private, fear petition-signers could be harassed and face their businesses being boycotted, similar to what happened to Proposition 8 supporters in California.

    The court action was prompted, in part, by a Bellingham blogger who wrote, “I advocate using violence against the property of all of those who are working tirelessly to hurt my family” and “government is enabling a vote on whether or not I should be allowed to see my husband while he is dying in a hospital — any normal man would be driven to get a gun and kill those who tried such evil cruelty.”

    Yet this view is not shared by the majority of those who wish to view the names, or in some cases, post them on the internet.

    Brian Murphy, who is prepared to post the names of signers on his searchable Web site, whosigned.org, called it “shocking that Protect Marriage Washington is attacking gay and lesbian couples and their families and then somehow claiming the right to secrecy and victim status for themselves.”

    Judge Settle had previously granted a temporary restraining order blocking release of the names. His order Thursday preserves the status quo — the names remain secret — while he decides the case on its merits.

    The State of Washington is considering an appeal.

    Share

    DOMA Repeal Bill Coming Next Week

    September 10th, 2009

    By Kerry Eleveld,www.advocate.com

    The Advocate has learned that Democratic representative Jerrold Nadler of New York will be introducing legislation to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act next Tuesday. A Democratic aide confirmed that a press conference to announce the bill will be held September 15 at 11 a.m. at the House Triangle.

    NADLERX390

    The source said the bill currently has just over 50 cosponsors, but Congressman Nadler’s office has not yet officially circulated a letter to his fellow House members.

    Nadler told the Bay Area Reporter in July that the bill would amount to a full repeal of DOMA, including Section 2, which advises states to disregard same-sex marriages that have been legally performed in other states, and Section 3, which prohibits the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages.

    President Barack Obama supported full repeal of the legislation as a candidate and has reiterated that support in the White House. “I believe it’s discriminatory, I think it interferes with states’ rights, and we will work with Congress to overturn it,” Obama said of the 1996 law during an Oval Office signing ceremony in June.

    Eleveld is The Advocate’s Washington correspondent.

    Share

    Backers won’t appeal public vote on gay benefits

    September 10th, 2009

    By RACHEL LA CORTE (AP) – 18 hours ago

    OLYMPIA, Wash. — Supporters of the state’s most recent expansion of domestic partnership rights announced Wednesday they won’t appeal to the Washington Supreme Court to try and block a public vote on the new law.

    Washington Families Standing Together chairwoman Anne Levinson said the group will now focus on a campaign to ensure the law is retained.

    Referendum 71, sponsored by a conservative political group called Protect Marriage Washington, asks voters to approve or reject the “everything but marriage” domestic partnership law that state lawmakers passed earlier this year.

    The new law would add more legal rights to the state’s established domestic partnerships for gay couples, putting registered partners on par with married couples under state law. Under current Washington law, if one partner is at least 62, unmarried heterosexual couples are also allowed to register as domestic partners.

    An “accept” vote on R-71 would put the newest law into place, and a “reject” vote would block it. The underlying laws laying out domestic partnerships — enacted in 2007 and broadened once already in 2008 — would not be affected.

    In a statement late Wednesday, Levinson said the group has to prepare for the election “without the distraction of an ongoing legal debate.” But she said it still disagrees with the Tuesday ruling of a Thurston County Superior Court judge who wouldn’t block the vote.

    Judge Thomas McPhee rejected the group’s argument that Secretary of State Sam Reed improperly accepted thousands of petition signatures that supported putting R-71 on the ballot.

    Levinson’s group had argued that signature-gatherers needed to sign declarations that, by law, were printed on the petitions professing that all the signatures were gathered properly. In some cases, the space on the back of the ballot for the signature-gatherer’s name was left blank or rubber-stamped with a sponsor’s signature.

    The judge sided with the state, which has accepted petitions without signed declarations since 2006 under legal guidance from the state attorney general.

    McPhee also rejected the argument that Reed improperly counted signatures from people who weren’t registered voters when they signed the petitions.

    “But this fight isn’t about the interpretation of referenda statutes,” Levinson said. “Something far more important is at stake.”

    Reed certified R-71 for the November ballot last week. Election officials revised the number of accepted signatures downward Tuesday, after an audit showed some signatures had been incorrectly accepted.

    The latest official tally of accepted petition signatures for R-71 was 121,780 — about 1,200 more than the minimum required to qualify for the ballot.

    Protect Washington attorney Stephen Pidgeon said he was happy the legal battle to the ballot had ended.

    “We believe that even though this is an impassioned issue that civil discourse is possible, that the high road can be taken, and that ultimately Washington voters will make an intelligent and informed decision,” he said.

    A separate federal lawsuit brought by R-71′s sponsors seeks to keep those signed referendum petitions secret.

    The petitions are considered public records under state law, but R-71′s sponsors claim petition-signers could face harassment by political opponents if their names are released. U.S. District Judge Benjamin Settle is expected to rule in that case this week.

    The domestic partnership expansion was supposed to take effect July 26, but the referendum campaign put it on hold. Now, the law will take effect only if approved by voters Nov. 3.

    As of this week, more than 5,900 domestic partnerships have been filed with the state since the law took effect in 2007.

    Share